Vavels Ratings

With Vavel as the rating-site, comunio seems getting completely senseless. I don't know, how they're picking these ratings, but they are just complete bullshit.

e.g. Eden Hazard today. At whoscored he has got 9.1 points and was even named Man of the Match. Our lovely Vavel however gave him 5(!) rating-points. This seems to be completely random and unfair.

I don't know why you had to pick out this dubious site, but with their ratings comunio isn't that kind of fun like it was before.

+ could you explain me, why you don't use the ratings that Vavel UK site does? I just can't see any sense in using the Vavel ES ratings.

MaxaMania wrote:

With Vavel as the rating-site, comunio seems getting completely senseless. I don't know, how they're picking these ratings, but they are just complete bullshit. e.g. Eden Hazard today. At whoscored he has got 9.1 points and was even named Man of the Match. Our lovely Vavel however gave him 5(!) rating-points. This seems to be completely random and unfair. I don't know why you had to pick out this dubious site, but with their ratings comunio isn't that kind of fun like it was before. + could you explain me, why you don't use the ratings that Vavel UK site does? I just can't see any sense in using the Vavel ES ratings.

I agree with you.

The ratings are arbitrary, don't have any sense

This rating system is a real joke. Players like Hazard or Jedinak are clearly the best players on the pitch and both receive ridiculous ratings from Vavel ES.

Please consider to switch to Vavel UK, otherwise this game is totally senseless.

Klausa,

I would like to have explanations for the vavel rating for the following players:

Jedinak
Hazard
Matic
Azpilicueta

Klausa,

to quote the Admins in your VAVEL announcement message:

"And the most important, Vavel is open to listen arguments and suggestions from the Comunio users".

My arguments for the 2 mentioned players are as follows:
Hazard: 1 goal / 7 key passes / 89% pass accuracy - VAVEL: 5
My proposal would be at least a rating of 7.

Matic: 5 tackles / 1 interception / 5 effective clearances - VAVEL: 4
My proposal would be at least 6. Bentaleb in comparison got a 7 rating but his stats are much worse than Matic.

Appreciate if you take it up with VAVEL.

Problem: You won't be able to correct them over and over again. They are rating too many players the wrong way.

Their full rating-system seems to be ridiculous, that's the point. It won't get better.

Fully agree with you. And I only took the most ridiculous ratings (in my team only).

I didn't make the point to necessarily change the rating but to make a point to the Comunio operators how obvious it is that their new rating partner is an absolute joke.

thanks, I'll look forward for your feedback this weekend. Then, I'll send it to Vavel directly.