Possible Position changes

Bale (Tottenham) D -> M

P.JONES ----------> Midfield

dbf3 wrote:

Foley midfielder to defender. He plays as a right back in Wolves.

Sorry again...Foley started at RB but now Zubar's back from injury, Foley is playing right midfield, ie he can play and has played both positions this season.

Be careful with changing the position of phil jones. His team has a new coach and maybe he's going to play like defender

P.Jones D-->M
Sharner M-->D

Maybe Tim Cahil could be a striker, he clearly never plays in the midfield.

Everybody, please notice that Gareth Bale is already a midfielder....

P Neville, Everton, M-->Defendor

TIM CAHILL: midfielder --> striker
this is a very clear case, he always plays as an striker

Arshavin maybe midfielder --> striker but it's now ok as a midfielder

Everton usually plays with one striker: Saha/Anichebe/Yakubu/Beckford.
Always 4-4-1-1. Cahill has always been midfielders, since few years attacking midfielder but never striker. Fábregas, Van der Vaart, Gerrard... there are also attacking midfielders.

P.Jones DEF----->MED
Foley MED----->DEF
Malouda MED-> DEL

malouda Mid--Forward(when lampard is ok, he plays at the same place than kalou, if he is forward, also malouda must be it.
p.jones Def-Mid
Arshavin Mid-Forward

Malouda is clearly a midfielder!

in many matches, when there are many forwards, Malouda plays as a central midfielder..

He definitely isn't a striker...

Tim Cahil on the other hand, is an attacking midfielder but he finds himself more in the opposite area than in the midfield. Anyway, it wouldn't be that bad if he stayed as a midfielder..

what you have said is true but if kalou or kuyt are strikers, cahill must be an striker too
he is the second striker in everton, but the second striker position must be considered as an striker, not a midfielder

Tim Cahill is an atacking midfielder, he is just too offensive, but he is a midfielder, he has been playing there all his life.... but he scores many goals which is awesome!

Last edited by Guest on 23 Dec 2010 00:54; edited 1 time in total

Not all his life. Australia always plays with Cahill as their most offensive striker
Anyway, he's the scorer in Everton
I think he must be striker yet

elpelas wrote:

Not all his life. Australia always plays with Cahill as their most offensive striker Anyway, he's the scorer in Everton I think he must be striker yet

That´s just because the rest of the Australian team sucks...

change player's positions

Clark (Aston Villa) Defender to Midfielder
Coleman (Everton) Defender to Midfielder
Heitinga (Everton) Defender to Midfielder
P. Neville (Everton) Midfielder to Defender
P. Jones (Blackburn Rovers) Defender to Midfielder
Kuyt (Liverpool FC) Striker to Midfielder
Kalou (Chelsea FC) Striker to Midfielder
Welbeck (Sunderland AFC) Striker to Midfielder

I have Welbeck and T. Cahill, yes, but change them would be unreal, I think. They are polyvalent players who rarely play in that sites. Coleman, Phil Jones or Heitinga yes, in my opinion can be changed.

Kuyt, Kalou and wellbeck are strikers.

It's wrong to judge only the last games, u should see the general position of the players and think where they'll play if someone else gets injured.

wellbeck played only the last 2-3 matches as an RM, he generally is a striker
Kuyt plays an attacking role and if torres is injured or if the system changes, he plays as a striker.
Kalou is not even close to being a midfielder, he is always near the opposite area.

Generally I believe that all the players' positions are correct

I'm a Blackburn fan and i know Phil Jones well

Phil has been playing all the season as midfielder until the last match in which he was on the bench and replaced to Samba in 55'. He played (until 65' when he was injured) as central defender.

Phil always has been a central defender and he will play there in the next years. This season Big Sam uses him as midfielder because of injuries to other players as Grella, Andrews or Nzonzi, the defensive midfielders of Rovers.

I understand that his position is changed, but perhaps, in 12 months, it would have to change again

maloua is clearly a forward!!he just played like a midfielder cause lampard was out, and chelsea didnt have any midfielder, but chelsea usually plays 4-3-3- with obi mikel essien and lampard in the mid and kalou drobga and malouda like a forwards, so if kalou is forward, why malouda dont??
phil jones is of course midfielder.

kalou and anelka have the potential and they have played many times as strikers. Malouda has never played there.
It's impossible to consider as striker a player that plays so far from the area.

chelsea has 4 strikers: Drogba,Anelka,Kalou and Sturridge. That's it..

i dont think so. malouda plays at the same place than kalou and anelka. they only have drogba at the front, but if anelka and kalou are strikers, also malouda.
you can see than malouda has more goals than all of the others together!
also foley should be def.

legbe, that's wrong, when torres is injured his position is occupied by ngog, not kuyt

take a look at this and you'll understand why malouda is a midfielder. This is a game plan for the game against arsenal. Now tell me if kalou could ever play this role.

http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/football/premier-league/2010-2011/arsenal-chelsea-381315.html

about kuyt, I know that for the time being ngog plays as a backup to torres. But things change...