DEFOE RATING 0 ????

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/3318100/Aston-Villa-1-Tottenham-2.html

You seriously need to get rid of these the-rubbish-sun ratings!!!!! Let me quote from

THE SUN MATCH CENTRE LIVE COMMENTARY:

Quote:

Rafael Van der Vaart's opener handed Spurs a deserved lead, but both sides will be disappointed with the officials after a string of contentious decisions. Younes Kaboul had a goal disallowed even though the ball did not appear to go out of play and Emile Heskey was denied a possible penalty after being brought down by Heurelho Gomes in the box, but Martin Atkinson and his assistants saved the strangest decision until last, sending off the previously lively Jermain Defoe for an innocuous aerial challenge with James Collins. Presumably the linesman thought an elbow had been thrown, but there seemed to be little evidence of that.

That Rating does not reflect the Sun's intention. Maybe they wanted to get him out of the rating! You seriously should look for better ratings!!!

THANKS!

More of the Sun shit:

- West Brom loses 0-2 and everybody gets a grade 8? While winners Stoke get a shit?
- Rooney and Giggs (both didn't play well and Giggs even got subbed) get a 9 while Berbatov with 2 goals just gets an 8? (So Rooney and Giggs get the same grade Berba got when he smashed 5 against Blackburn

0 score??that must be a mistake. -16 points?

rooney is gay. thesun is a bad newspaper.

isn't 0 a lowest rating you can get (equals to -10 points)?

this is just crazy once more:

crouch got a 3, jenas played for 5 min. doing a good job and got a 2! Corluka played only seconds and got a 2 too.

these guys are sick..

In addition, Krul made a terrible match and a 5.
West Brom too, had 5 players with 8 despite losing the game..

I can honestly tell you that whichever match I watch, the next day I get always surprised with the ratings, the guys should drink some tea and leave football alone.

west brom who lost form bolton have much better ratings then west ham who won 1-3...

sueha86 wrote:

More of the Sun shit: - West Brom loses 0-2 and everybody gets a grade 8? While winners Stoke get a shit? - Rooney and Giggs (both didn't play well and Giggs even got subbed) get a 9 while Berbatov with 2 goals just gets an 8? (So Rooney and Giggs get the same grade Berba got when he smashed 5 against Blackburn

You didn't see Man-United vs Sunderland. Giggs played very well in first half, Rooney did a great match and Berbatov also. For me, the best player was Craig Gordon who saved to Blackcats for receiving 4 or 5 goals...

Bolton-West Brom report on Premier League official website
http://www.premierleague.com/page/MatchReports/0,,12306~51967,00.html

They say that West Brom had many chances and played well, but Wanderers put goals...

It´s imposible!!!! Defoe has -16 points, and, if you see the sun defoe had 0 points!! Is it an error?

Please, you have to revise the puntuation because it isn´t logical!!!

I hope an answer please.

My name is David, and my community is "vamos habana!!!"

Thank´s

Legbe wrote:

west brom who lost form bolton have much better ratings then west ham who won 1-3...

Fulham - West Ham was a very bored match. I undestood yesterday because both teams are in the danger zone.

Fulham played very very bad; Robert Green (he made two great saves) and Cole were the best in Hammers.

DEM012 wrote:

It´s imposible!!!! Defoe has -16 points, and, if you see the sun defoe had 0 points!! Is it an error? Please, you have to revise the puntuation because it isn´t logical!!! I hope an answer please. My name is David, and my community is "vamos habana!!!" Thank´s

Note 0 = -10 comunio points
red card = -6 comunio points
Total = -16 comunio points

gsus77 wrote:

Legbe wrote: west brom who lost form bolton have much better ratings then west ham who won 1-3... Fulham - West Ham was a very bored match. I undestood yesterday because both teams are in the danger zone. Fulham played very very bad; Robert Green (he made two great saves) and Cole were the best in Hammers.

I watched the whole match and west ham was much better than the ratings...
Fulham, indeed didn't play well..

Thank´s, so, It´s correct

@sueha86: thanks for your feedback! We're thankful for new suggestions concerning the rating media!